WGA 2020 | Ireland | Introduction

Introduction

Question:
Briefly reflect about when and why a WGA has/hasn’t been introduced in your country. In what ways does a WGA in your country reflect the country’s specificities (e.g. in relation to its institutional and constitutional set-up)?

Ireland Expert

Isaac Bennett

PhD Researcher, UCD School of Politics and International Relations, Dublin

Isaac Bennett is a second-year PhD Researcher at the UCD School of Politics and International Relations in Dublin. His research focuses on the relationship between advanced military technology and casualty aversion in democratic countries. Prior to this research, Isaac worked as the owner and operator of Bennett Research Services, a political and security affairs consultancy. He was engaged in several projects for lobby groups and individuals, including a large, in-depth analysis of alleged police and judicial corruption in Ireland (2015). Between 2015 and 2017, he worked for the Cork County Council as part of a change management team to improve local government service provision to citizens and to enhance communication links via a new website. Isaac holds a BA in History and Political Science from Trinity College Dublin (2012), and an MA in International Security and Conflict Studies from Dublin City University (2014).

Ben Tonra

Full Professor of International Relations, UCD School of Politics and International Relations, Dublin

Ben Tonra is Full Professor of International Relations at the UCD School of Politics and International Relations in Dublin. There, he teaches, researches and publishes on European foreign, security and defence policy; Irish foreign, security and defence policy; and the theory of international relations. Outside the university, he has served as Chair of the Royal Irish Academy’s Standing Committee on International Affairs and is a Co-leader of a research programme on EU security and defence at the Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA) in Dublin. In Ireland, he has also lectured for and worked with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Department of Defence, and the Defence Forces. Previously, he was a Lecturer at the Department of International Politics of the University of Wales (Aberystwyth) and a Research Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, DC. Ben is a graduate of the University of Limerick (BA and MA) and completed his doctoral studies at the University of Dublin (Trinity College) in 1996.

Ireland
Report
PDF

There are several likely explanations for why whole-of-government approaches (WGAs) to external security crises are underdeveloped in Ireland compared to other EU countries. The majority of these are practical and related to the nation’s small geographical size and relatively small population. Both of these factors allow for the centralisation of government departments and agencies, and therefore make it possible to have all stakeholders in a particular external security crisis in the same room at the same time. Indeed, because of the ‘everyone knows everyone else’ factor that is unique to countries with smaller populations, the need for formal WGA structures has not been a priority. That is not to say that the WGA structures and protocols are nonexistent or that those that do exist are wholly deficient, but rather that they exist in a more ad hoc and informal manner without any strictly defined overarching policy or government documentation setting out how these structures may be operationalised.

The historical context is important for understanding why this informal WGA has been taken and is reflective of Ireland’s long-established and active engagement in international security – most notably, an unbroken record of 60 years’ service with UN peacekeeping missions. As a result of this historical context, Ireland has developed many informal and rapid-response mechanisms to gather key actors together in one room and to develop an effective plan for responding to external crises. Over time, this has evolved into what can be called a WGA to dealing with external security crises without being bogged down by unnecessary red tape and administrative logjamming. Particularly in the field of responses to external security crises, our WGA may be ad hoc and informal on paper. But, in practice, the relevant agencies and departments are able to organise, mobilise and deploy in a rapid and orderly manner.

There are mechanisms and processes that go into effect without the need for formal recognition of their existence and function, which in turn enables the relevant actors and agencies to cooperate and coordinate without the restrictions that formalisation brings. Of course, such a setup creates significant trade-offs. In the first place, there is little to no parliamentary interactions or cross-party consultation on responses to external crises. Information requests for briefings and updates can be made and are dealt with through the relevant constitutional channels, but this is considered to be the exception rather than the norm. The second considerable trade-off is that without any formal documentation of how WGAs are dealt with and the ways and means to carry out a WGA to external security crises, there is a risk of knowledge loss over time.

Ireland Report